They pop up on the television, from different cities. Slava Bilic and Laurent Blanc could theoretically meet in the quarterfinals, although not the way they met in 1998 – with one of them reeling in faked mortal pain.  

Bilic and Blanc are two of the most charismatic figures in the European soccer championships, even though they do their work on the sidelines. In their respective first games, the camera lingered on them, as if doing a favor for those of us who remember 1998.

Coaching Croatia in the first match against Ireland, Bilic resembled a roguish literature professor, played by a younger Donald Sutherland, with a blue blazer and blue ski cap perched on his head, red tie askew. He looked like a teacher who gives his best seminars in a smoky pub.

Blanc, who coaches France, was wearing a shirt and tie, his glasses making him look like a chemistry teacher, who doesn’t talk much in or out of the laboratory. But his bounce when the referee makes an unfavorable call gives him away as an athlete, inside the Clark Kent outfit.

They have met before – in the semifinals of the World Cup in 1998, tangling in a scrum before a free kick. Blanc gave Bilic a mild push high on the chest and Bilic went sprawling backward, clutching his face, as if he had been hit by a tire iron. The referee sent Blanc off with a red card, the only one of his career, and he had to miss the final match after France held on to defeat Croatia.

At the time, Bilic was generally vilified for his blatant faking. The replays were quite clear – a modest push, nowhere near the face, maybe worth a yellow card, but more likely just the normal close-order combat in the box. Bilic was mortified at costing Blanc a place in the final (France beat Brazil) but never backed off his assertion that he had been fouled, and reacted the way footballers react – with improvised death throes.

To this day, Blanc says the contact was his fault, but he knows he did not deserve a red card. In this Euro tournament, the sons-of-Bilic continue their flopping. It’s hard to justify diving to Americans who are not soccer fans, but most of us who love the sport accept it as gamesmanship, working the ref to dig out his card, as an impulse.

There is even the suspicion that some players practice their dives the way others practice their free kicks. To be a soccer fan, one has to be a combination drama critic and gymnastics judge.

Bilic was guilty of bad acting. The ref deserved a red card for not checking with his associates on the sideline. The game goes on.

Bilic is leaving his post after this tournament; he has given six years to coaching his homeland, as a patriotic gesture, he has said. Blanc is not even two years into his chore of trying to resurrect the fallen power of France. They are World Cup-level players, the best and brightest of their time. Croatia and France could both qualify for the quarterfinals on June 23 or 24. It would be fun to see them shake hands, this time with nobody staggering backward in feigned agony.

(Your comments-replies-critiques are more than welcome right here. GV.)

Picture
Slava Bilic in Arctic Poznan
Picture
Laurent Blanc in Equatorial Donetsk
 


Comments

Alan Rubin
06/12/2012 8:36pm

George,

Thanks again for a very timely post as I’m currently updating “Rule-5 The Referee” section of my educational soccer web site. http://www.understandingsoccer.com/rule-5-the-referee.html.

There is a reference to “diving” in it, but I’d like to expand upon it a bit here.

My web site is an outgrowth of an adult education course that I teach in the Berkshires. Jeff Cukor, a professional soccer referee gave an enlightening talk in one of the sessions this past June in which I gained a greater appreciation for referees. The referee’s role is to enforce the rules and control the game, but he emphasized that how it is accomplished is equally important. Much of this is on the web site, but diving is of interest to this topic. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diving_(football)#Detection.

FIFA requires that a yellow card be given if the referee believes that the player is trying to deceive him to draw a foul. Although it is obvious that Blanc did not foul, his penalty should have been a yellow card. The referee violated the spirit of the rules in that no penalty, unless it is a severe one, should be a game changer.

Referees also take into consideration the game situation when awarding fouls. For example, a yellow card awarded to a player early in the game may not be given to the same player during the later stages since it is effectively a red card. A penalty should not be greater than the crime or have a game changing effect.

Referees are re-examined each year to update them on the rules and to determine their physical fitness. Jeff indicated that the more FIFA addresses the “diving” problem, the smarter the players become. They are also evaluated and debriefed for several hours after each game.

Referees are instructed to keep the yellow card in their breast pocket and the red card in the back pants pocket. Jeff said that he often changed his mind from red to yellow in the few moments that it took to reach into his back pocket.

The national temperament, a player’s reputation and the importance of the game also influences referee’s decisions. Jeff gave the example of a player who told the referee that he did not mean to foul after he received a yellow card. The reply was “I know, otherwise it would have been a red”.

Officiating is not easy as decisions must be made in split seconds and with the luxury of hindsight. Calls can be missed if the referee is not in a good position to see the play clearly. That is why communication among the refereeing team is important.

On the other hand, some referees are just plain lousy.


Reply
bruce picken
06/12/2012 10:59pm

george, as i've ranted about in previous emails--diving is a pox on soccer. replays should be used and the divers punished severely and any penalties rescinded. thought of this the other night while i was watching the stanley cup final. can't remember the player, but he was russian and had taken a stick to the face. had a shot of him later in the game with a gash from his nose to, and including, his lip. soccer player would've been out for life......

Reply
George Vecsey
06/13/2012 9:44am

Bruce, check out the video linked on the words "practive their dives."
They do practice them, at least psychologically.
I watch matches and my body reacts to some contact by saying, no way I go down for that -- the way hockey players' bodies and minds react. But find Bilic's comments linked in my essay and you'll see him explaining the mind of a soccer player, while essentially admitting he overdid it by grabbing his face. It's like Kabuki or Noh theatre -- highly ritual behavior. GV

Reply
Alan Rubin
06/13/2012 4:39pm

George

Good diving videos. There should be a category at the Academy Awards.

An English humorist did a piece on diving prior to the 2010 World Cup. He explained how each country had its own style of diving. No YouTube videos are available as it was on the radio.

The Italian style was to roll over at least three times and then lie on their back looking up at the sky. Sorry, but I do not remember the others.

Alan Rubin
06/13/2012 5:01pm

Bruce

Contrary to the culture of too many professional sports, especially hockey, I do not believe it is necessary to obtain fan support through violence. Olympic and European hockey is very popular and exciting without it. Fans will accept a good product if given the opportunity.

Why should actions that are considered criminal in real life be condoned and applauded in sporst?

Hockey, at the very least, should adopt some soccer style penalties. A major penalty should be an automatic ejection. A yellow/red card type of system in which repeated penalties are severe punished might help if management won't stop the violence.

How could pro football's penalties for the bounty system be so minor. Being paid to injure another player is a criminal act. Someone's career could have been ended and possibly be permanently disabled.

The Black Sox scandal's players were banned from baseball, correctly or incorrectly, for throwing games. No one was physically injured, but the integrity of baseball was the issue.

In sports, as well as most things concerning big business, the customer is always taken for granted.

Reply
bruce picken
06/13/2012 11:02am

george, i'll check it out. i guess hockey players practice tipping the puck instead of that stuff. i know it's a matter of pride to gain an advantage by diving. still rankles the hell out of me tho. it's so bad that unless i see blood gushing or a bone sticking out or the guy not breathing for more than two minutes that i think he's faking. the arms dramatically splaying out is a good tip if you have any doubt about the reality of a foul......

Reply
JA
06/14/2012 12:15am

I agree with you, George. I wouldn't exactly say I'm a fan of diving and gamesmanship (I doubt many would classify themselves as that), but I've never understood the rage and vitriol it seems to inspire in so many fans.

Retroactive punishment based off of replays is a dangerous road to go down when it comes to simulation. If someone takes a dive, boo the player, chastise the referee if he's gotten it wrong, but then get on with it.

Reply
Alan Rubin
06/14/2012 10:17am

JA--You are correct in that fans tend to over react to too many aspects of sports. I believe that referee error, or perceived error, is part of soccer. As frustrating as an obvious error my be, it adds to the excitement of the game.

However, technology should not be totally dismissed. The outcome of too many important games have been altered by scored goals being either disallow or missed.

There should be a sensor about 1-2 feet behind the goal that triggers a photo and/or an alarm indicating that the ball has passed totally over the goal line. Stoppage of play for an instant replay would not be necessary as the goal would be indicated automatically.

Reply
JA
06/14/2012 11:39pm

Alan - I agree goal line technology would be a strong improvement, and your ideas are well reasoned.

What I was making reference to in my original post is the idea many have of "punishing" divers by handing out suspensions after the match as some faceless committee in a dark room reviews tape of the incident and delves inside the player's mind to learn his motives or plays amateur physicist to determine whether or not a player was shoved hard enough to merit going to the ground.

Alan Rubin
06/15/2012 7:19am

JA

I understood and agreed with what you meant. I just wanted to get in my 2 cents on goal line technology.

Reply
bruce picken
06/14/2012 10:12am

NO argument from me about the unnecessary nonsense. i used to be a sports reporter in a previous life and grew up before expansion (born in 1950). for a few winters i covered 200-225 hockey games a year. you get tired of the b.s. pretty quickly. it's hard to understand--actually i guess it isn't since violence sells--how anybody can get away with anything these days with the technology available.

Reply
George Vecsey
06/14/2012 2:45pm

Speaking of diving, how did you like my Italians today?
I've loved the entire package since I covered the 82 WC.
I get happy when I hear the anthem.
I don't root. I just get happy.
Their expressions of innocence or victimization today were classic.
I would not change anything about the sport that involved downgrading the opera buffa.
Plus Pirlo's FK.

By the way, for all who pass this way, Alan Rubin was too modest to mention his promising young soccer-centric web site, which he is building as we go along. The site is:

www.understandingsoccer.com

GV

Reply
George Vecsey
06/14/2012 3:13pm

Plus, I should have added that Howard Webb was totally in control. GV

Reply
Alan Rubin
06/14/2012 4:29pm

George,

Thanks for the mention. Except for the perpetual tweaks, my goal was to have the site finished by mid-August, but you have given me an incentive to accelerate things.

For those who navigate the site, all comments, suggestions, criticisms, etc. would be greatly appreciated. Hopefully, it will be an enjoyable trip.

Alan


Reply



Leave a Reply