Picture
Clint making a fool of himself, left. Clint making a terrific movie, right.
Because he’s an artist.

In his relative old age, Clint has made films that forced me to think and feel; given the male-slacker crap I see advertised as fall films, I would say that is quite an accomplishment.

It’s true, Clint made a fool of himself in public, on cue, during the Republican convention. Apparently, he was put in that slot because Mitt Romney likes his make-my-day message. We should not be surprised after watching Romney sneer at half the country in front of his own people, the entitled rich. So Clint was no accident.

However, if Chris Christie can pine for respect from Bruce Springsteen, (ignoring the messages in the man’s songs), then I reserve the right to respect Clint the film-maker, Clint the actor.

I never had any interest in Clint’s first decades, the inarticulate avenger riding across the west or the urban landscape. But he got interesting in his old age.

Somehow I sought out The Unforgiven in 1992, knowing I would like it. It’s about an aging gunslinger who expects he will not be forgiven for the murders and robberies he has committed. Raising two children in poverty, his wife dead, he has acquired a sense of mortality along with morality -- an emergence of conscience, rarely encountered in American films,

When he is pulled back in through his need to care for his children, Clint now lives by a code. Killing makes him sick. He can no longer sleep with a woman, even when that offer is made from tender appreciation of his protection. His gravel Clint voice says, I aint like that no more. It’s not a bad code to tuck in our wallets.

Ultimately, he shoots up the bad guys. It is, after all, a Clint movie. He walks into the saloon and asks: Who’s the fellow owns this shithole? (How many times have I muttered this line in some crummy restaurant or motel? Without ensuing damage, of course.)

After the carnage, Clint rides out of town, warning people to bury his murdered pal (Morgan Freeman) and addressing the entire citizenry: “Better not cut up nor otherwise harm no whores or I’ll come back and kill every one of you sons of bitches….” He is still threatening what he will do as he vanishes into the rainy night. We understand the gunslinger is a parable; it’s only a movie; but still.

In 2008, Clint issued Gran Torino, about an aging autoworker in fading Detroit, now being populated by Hmong refugees from the hill country of Laos. The film could have been called Unforgiven II because it is about a man who knows he can never escape what he did during the Korean war.

My favorite part is where Clint advises his young Hmong protégé how to carry himself like an American, including ethnic insults to friends. I also like when Clint is charmed by the young man’s college-going sister, who slyly persists in calling him Wally, causing him to grunt that his name is Walt. It would not be a Clint movie if he didn’t menace a few punks and bring about justice through a hail of bullets.

Of course, Clint could have used some of that tolerance when he addressed an empty chair that represented the President of the United States. We have known all along, watching the resentful ‘50’s redneck pusses on McConnell, Boehner and Cantor, that these last four years have really been about race. Now we watch Mitt Romney address his own kind. For the first time in this campaign, expressing scorn for collective modern society, the man comes alive; he’s the guy who brought in Clint, undoubtedly knowing of the contempt within.

Still, Clint has grown to make movies about conscience, about the potential for growth.He’s an artist. I hold him to a different standard.

 


Comments

Altenir Silva
09/19/2012 7:14pm

Hi George!

How're you? I hope very fine. I loved your text about Mr. Eastwood. I think he is one master with movies and a little bit "mistaken" about policy like David Mamet (other master wrong?).

All the best - Altenir Silva (from Brazil)

Reply
George Vecsey
09/20/2012 8:17am

Dear Altenir: Because you are a writer, you understand how complex and different writers and artists can be. I saw that Clint said if somebody was "dumb enough" to invite him to speak in public, he had to know Clint might do something unusual. That;one way of looking at it. Muito obrigado. GV

Reply
Altenir Silva
09/20/2012 10:09am

Hi George,

In Brazil, we say that everything turns for SAMBA. I think in Hollywood everything turns for SHOWBIZ. :-) Mr. Eastwood can talk with anything like chair, table, stool, guitar and ball of game... He's Eastwood and already has given us so many wonderful movies... it's great... the rest is business... "There's No Business Like Show Business!"

All the best - Altenir Silva (from Brazil)

Brian Savin
09/20/2012 1:49pm

I like sedevacantist comedy. Anyway, maybe Clint Eastwood gave at least one of those two boring conventions a chance to be remembered for something.

Reply
George Vecsey
09/20/2012 2:36pm

Five years from now when Clint is producing a (respctful) film about Barack Obama, the question will be, who was that rich stiff whose convention Clint enlivened?

Reply
Brian Savin
09/20/2012 7:40pm

I wouldn't hold my breath, George, as much as I sincerely, completely wish you were right about Clint being motivated in the future to revise his view. I voted for Obama with great, great hope. But I have been too close to this failed Administration and, after experiencing his failure to lead public discussion on any substantive issue, after seeing the Academy award winning documentary, Inside Job, and reading the Pulitzer winning author Suskind's Confidence Men, and being invited (and going) to the White House for consultations at the invitation of officials who have since left the Administration in disgust, it is pretty clear to me that we have a set of problems our President is unwilling or simply unable to address. Clint, unfortunately, may have gotten it right. I have no idea if Romney would be any better, but his record as Governor is genuinely progressive and at odds with his national party. His odds of winning are miniscule, however, so he won't get the chance. That is probably too bad and Clint probably agrees with me.

Brian Savin
09/20/2012 7:40pm

I wouldn't hold my breath, George, as much as I sincerely and completely wish you were right about Clint being motivated in the future to revise his view. I voted for Obama with great, great hope. But I have been too close to this failed Administration and, after experiencing his failure to lead public discussion on any substantive issue, after seeing the Academy award winning documentary, Inside Job, and reading the Pulitzer winning author Suskind's Confidence Men, and being invited (and going) to the White House for consultations at the invitation of officials who have since left the Administration in disgust, it is pretty clear to me that we have a set of problems our President is unwilling or simply unable to address. Clint, unfortunately, may have gotten it right. I have no idea if Romney would be any better, but his record as Governor is genuinely progressive and at odds with his national party. His odds of winning are miniscule, however, so he won't get the chance. That is probably too bad and Clint probably agrees with me.

George Vecsey
09/20/2012 10:44pm

Brian, thanks. I guess I was projecting some creative arc for Clint down the line, or just hallucinating. But my more immediate position is that Obama has been sandbagged by deliberate obstructionists, and whatever has or has not happened over four years, Romney is being abandoned by his own party by the hour. Romney';s disgrace may help Obama lead for the next four years. GV

Reply
John McDermott
09/21/2012 4:00pm

Brilliant George. You have(once again) read my mind. The Unforgiven and Gran Torino are two of my favorite movies by Eastwood(personally I think if you compare Eastwood and Woody Allen the former's work has been ever on the rise while Mr. Manhattan's work has been inconsistent as he ages). Anyway, I have a sneaking suspicion that Clint also has plenty of disdain for a lot of Republicans and some of their ideas for which he has little use or sympathy. Don't forget, Clint made that great movie Bird, with Forrest Whitaker, about Charlie Parker and more recently Invictus, about Mandela and the S. Africa rugby team. I think he's a lot more complex than many people think. I would love to be a fly on the wall during a conversation between Clint and his buddy Morgan Freeman after that talking-an-empty-chair performance.

Reply
George Vecsey
09/21/2012 4:10pm

John, I knew there was another film on my mind. (I saw bits of the Japanese war film, and he showed the humanity of them, too.)
Invictus was very nice -- maybe a little pat, a little easy. But that great scene where the white bodyguards demonstrate rugby to the black bodyguards, just brilliant, very visceral. Thanks, G

Reply
Brian Savin
09/21/2012 4:22pm

Invictus was great! I was down in NZ for much of that year and became a huge All Blacks fan. Clint made me really like the Springboks (even if they did hire the same guys that did in George Foreman in the Rumble in the Jungle a few hundred miles and a few years distant!).

John McDermott
09/21/2012 6:16pm

Flags of Our Fathers was ok. But I thought Letters from Iwo Jima was much better. Can you believe they shot a film about Iwo Jima in Iceland?

John McDermott
09/21/2012 4:03pm

p.s.-Romney is revealing himself to be as big a clown as any major candidate we've had in recent memory. His platform should be: "I won't raise your taxes, and I'm white. And by the way, we Mormons are just like all you other Christians, except for the funny underwear."

Reply
George Vecsey
09/21/2012 10:29pm

Brian, not sure where to place this, but let's try at the bottom. What is "sedevacantist comedy"? GV

Reply
GEorge Vecsey
09/21/2012 10:32pm

John, it's an interesting point. Do you think that if Mitt were presdient -- which after sending his boy wonder out to lecture AARP today seems even less likely -- do you think people would see Pres. Mitt making a speech and envision the Underwear Situation underneath? Or is the underwear a metaphor? GV

Brian Savin
09/22/2012 9:21am

Sedevacantist comedy = "empty seat" comedy. Think the word originated as a religious term having to do with a false Pope.

George Vecsey
09/22/2012 12:50pm

Brian, that's a new one on me. Now I have to figure out a way to use it as perfectly as you did.
My friend the great NYC folk singer, Christine Lavin, used the word solipsistic in her epic tale about the woman in the supermarket who wouldn't put back a few items from the Express checkout lane. I think of Chris every time I use "her" word. GV

John McDermott
09/22/2012 2:12am

Let's hope that Mitty's relentless march toward self-destruction continues apace. The Republicans were so concerned that if W showed his face or opened his mouth that they turned him into a non-person, like one of those out-of-favor commissars magically retouched out of the photos in the times of Stalin or Krushchev. Now it's clear that their own chosen candidate is his own worst enemy, and a bigger problem than how to handle the still-living last Republican to occupy the White House. But how do you gag the candidate? As for the underwear situation...I think if people really dig around and find out what it's all about they'll probably have a laugh but wonder, "c'mon, the President of the United States can't REALLY believe that his special 'garments' protect him from harm like Superman, can he?"

Reply
09/25/2012 3:08pm

George

My initial reaction to Clint Eastwood’s performance at the Republican National Convention was to add him to my “no view” list along with Mel Gibson. Several days later, after reading a review of his next film, I questioned whether I really wanted to miss it.

I was puzzled by what Clint was trying to achieve. It certainly was popular with the base, but was it helpful to Mitt Romney’s image as a decision maker and called into question the judgement of his campaign staff? How could they not have vetted him?

This may have seemed like a little thing that would pass from the voters’ memories, but the little things that add up often are the most telling. They are often spontaneous and apparently of little significance at the time.

Romney’s recent self-destructing comments and actions are well documented and are in no need of additional comment. However, I would like to add a voice from Massachusetts, where he had been governor.

I moved fulltime to Berkshire County in western Mass in 2005 and became active in politics. I’m on the steering committee of a Democratic activist group that has worked to elect candidates in western MA, southern NH and eastern NY. Normally, eastern Mass believes that the state ends at Worchester, one hour west of Boston. The Berkshires are two and a half hours from Boston.

The Mass Democrat Party’s perception changed after Scott Brown defeated Martha Coakley in the 2010 special election for Sen. Ted Kennedy’s seat. Berkshire County was one of two counties in the state that went for Coakley, and by an almost three to one margin. Since then we have had an ear in Boston.

Politicians running for office or reelection in state and local contests have spoken at candidate meetings sponsored by my organization. Many of them now head state financial and legal agencies, and one is the Governor.

The message from people in the political know has been consistent; Mitt Romney was a disaster as the governor. His administration was not sensitive to the needs of the state and the local communities. Bills were passed for worthy projects in communities throughout the state, but the money was never allocated so jobs were lost.

It was believed that Mitt did not run for reelection because he would have lost. Bain Capital put B-K Toys, based in Pittsfiled, into bankruptcy after making a huge profit and giving some key executives large buyouts. The rest of the employees lost their jobs without any severance pay. This is still a big topic, especially in an election year.

It defies common sense, but it seems to be in keeping with Mitt’s inability to define what he really stands for, why does he distance himself from the one achievement of his governorship—Mass HEALTH CARE!!!

In addition to all rhetoric about the candidates, on so many issues, character should not be overlooked. Both candidates have their short comings, but Obama’s principles are clear, while Romney is like a chameleon.

Reply
Brian Savin
09/25/2012 3:37pm

Oh dear. There are lots of views 'bout politics, Alan, and lots of sites on which to declare them in this kind of detail about one candidate being better than another. A different kind of perspective was provided by former Times reporter Chris Hedges yesterday and it might be useful for all of us to appreciate that there isn't a lot of holy water to bathe in this election year. Take a look below:

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/how_do_you_take_your_poison_20120924/

09/22/2012 1:16pm

Hi George -- Did you know I wrote a new verse of "What Was I Thinking?" in honor of Clint? It goes like this:

Oh his name is Clint Eastwood
big time movie star
but when stars fall from the firmament
sometimes they fall very very very very far
Asked to speak at the Republican convention
Clint unwisely said Yes
Did Democrats spike the air?
he picked a fight with a chair
instead of helping Mtt
he made a mess

Clint . . . what were you thinking?
on network TV?
you ramble on for 16 minutes
you were only supposed to ramble on for three
What were you thinking?
Dirty Harry . . . what can I say?
your superfluous solipsistic soliloquy
made my day

(There's that word again). Ciao! Christine

Reply
Brian Savin
09/22/2012 1:59pm

This should make everyone's day.....(well, after the first 7 or 8 minutes!)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JyV2ozhOSp0

Reply
09/23/2012 1:27pm

Christine and Bruce

Great ode to Clint and youtube link. Christine's dialog songs are in the tradition of Woody and Arlo.

Reply



Leave a Reply