Picture
Trayvon Martin: Guilty of Walking While Black
Never touch anything in a store.

I still remember an African-American colleague telling me what she warned her two sons, decades ago. When they went to a department store or a toy store in New York, they were under strict orders to keep their hands at their sides, lest somebody get the wrong idea.

Knowing how people love to touch things  – and how hands-on is tolerated as a normal part of business – I could only cringe at the double standard my friend had to inculcate in her sons.

The perceptions are still out there, even with an African-American president in the White House. Or maybe because of it.

Take back our country. That sentiment careens around the Internet. What is worse is that versions of it are put forth by elected officials like Eric Cantor, the man with the most sour expression in Congress, who recently said Mitt Romney would “get us back on track.”

Everybody knows the code. It was no accident that Cantor echoed the resentful tone that has been going around since November of 2008. The Trumps and Palins and McConnells of the country have been treating the president as an interloper, an outsider. Wonder why.

I have no way of knowing what was bouncing around in the mind of George Zimmerman, 28, who allegedly followed and killed Trayvon Martin, 17, in Florida three weeks ago. Was this volunteer vigilante hopped up by the rhetoric in Congress and the campaign trails, that things are not quite right at the moment? Or does the traditional racist undertone of the country survive on its own, without blatant help from prominent politicians?

Any of us with friends and relatives of color know the double takes and the stares.

Children, particularly boys, are warned to watch their step when they go out.

The photos of Trayvon Martin will break your heart. The sweet trusting smile. Surely, this young man heard the warnings from loved ones to be careful out in public.

Even then, with the gun laws and the stand-your-ground law in Florida and the inflamed rhetoric going around, any caution Trayvon Martin had learned in his 17 years was not enough, as he ran into a stranger with his own notion of taking something back.

 


Comments

Michael Berman
03/21/2012 3:43pm

It is a shame and tragedy that our country cannot escape our racist history.

But I strongly take issue with your use of "Take back our country," as a rallying cry for the Trumps, Palins, McConnells, and their followers. They have hijacked America for far too long.

It is time that WE THE PEOPLE should take back our country from the likes of them and the Limbaughs, Roves, Cantors, Gingriches, et al. Unfortunately the list is too long. If we don't act, we are to blame and our children and country will suffer.

Reply
Hansen Alexander
03/22/2012 11:44am

George, a thoughtful commentary on our terrible problem of race that sticks to us like mud on a hot and humid August afternoon. We must confront the existential empiness and foolishness of encouraging people that they are superior to other human beings, whether it be race, class, education, etc. Every single person on this earth is unique and is good at something. We must devalue the idea of superiority. It is childish, hurtful, and in this case, fatal.

Reply
Brian Savin
03/22/2012 12:52pm

An unarmed boy with candy in his pocket is dead and cannot speak to us from the grave. An armed professional vigilante admits to killing him. That right there is enough for me. But there is still more. Tapes indicate he confronted the kid. Arrest him, charge him and let a jury of his peers to their duty. The pressure belongs on the Florida prosecutors to do justice and bring the charges.

Reply
charlie vincent
03/23/2012 6:49am

Perfectly said, George. And on a personal note, we have decided not to come to NYC this spring; Costa Rica called and we are answering, Have never been there. Hope to get to the city one of these days, though, and renew old acquaintances.

Reply
03/24/2012 6:19pm

Amen. I wish I would get some sort of alert when you post, although reading the pieces in bunches is also good.

Reply
George Vecsey
03/25/2012 9:12am

Tom, I think I tweet at @georgevecsey.
my guru set me up, and I type in a few words and send it off to tweet-land, advising of my latest.
I'm a little hazy about what happens after that...
brave new world.

Did you see that Agudelo went down?

GV

Reply
fbanta
03/26/2012 11:49am

Martin-Zimmerman is a tragedy, but until all the facts are known it's counterproductive and asinine to assess blame: eg Duke Lacrosse Team, Tawana Brawley, et al.

As for the president, his unrestrained assault on the Constitutional limits on his authority; his intention to 'fundamentally transform the US" in direct and absolute opposition to his oath of office; his moronic abdication of the missle defense system; his refusal to "take care that the laws of the US are faithfully executed"; his psychopathic lying have nothing to do with race-they have everything to do with his actions to subjugate citizens to tyranny.

Reply
MJG
03/27/2012 12:39pm

To fbanta, you are right that we need to wait until the facts are in. It is cringe inducing when political leaders use an event to rally thier cause, even when the cause is good, before the facts are in. It could discredit them and the cause if the facts don't fall in line with thier original narrative which they got people riled up about. It doesn't mean the cause isn't worth getting riled up about.

But then you fly off the rails in your second paragraph. I assume your talking about health care, the same plan Gingrich and conservative think tanks came up with in response to Clinton's health plan in the 90s. Now, you may disagree but the fact that conservatives who claim to hold the consititution in upmost reverence at one time supported this plan shows that it's in the realm of debate and certainly not unconstitional. His cuts to the millitary are supported by Panetta and went through a rigourous roundtable before plans were finalized. Your rhetoric at the end (has Obama used political spin more than other politicians?) shows your end game. When this "psychopath" type hyperbole begins, it's typically a sign of a "I want Conservatives to win and Liberals to lose" mindset.

You seem to be a fan of thinking things through in your first paragraph fbanta, I suggest you indulge those instincts some more.

Reply
George Vecsey
03/28/2012 8:12am

To all correspondents, the latter two in particular: thanks for your comments. I'm glad to spout off, and even more delighted to have people react in opposite -- and respectful -- ways. That's the fun of my new toy. Come back again. GV

Reply



Leave a Reply