I am currently polishing my book about the eight World Cups I have covered, enjoying memories from Barcelona in 1982 to the American rally against Algeria in 2010 on a goal by – now here’s a name from the past -- Landon Donovan.
The bulk of the book needs to be turned in by July 1 so it can be published next May, before the World Cup in Brazil. However, the last chapter is just sitting there, unfinished and unresolved. Right now it looks like the editor could be waiting for the final chunk of copy in late November. Our Lads are currently in the middle of six finalists from their region. The American team plays its two final qualifiers, against Jamaica in Kansas City on Oct. 11, and in Panama on Oct. 15. But if the Yanks finish fourth, they will have to play a home-and-home series against New Zealand, the winner from the Oceania Football Confederation, in November. After watching the Americans once again look inadequate in a friendly against Belgium on Wednesday night, I don’t see them dominating their Concacaf region. Jurgen Klinsmann’s team plays his home nation of Germany in Washington, D.C., on Sunday at 2:30 PM in good old RFK Stadium. The Germans have not called in regulars from Bayern Munich or Dortmund, who played in the Champions League final last Saturday, but I think reserve players from the Bundesliga could infiltrate the American defense. This generation – at least the version assembled and coached by Klinsmann – is clearly not working out. After watching the defense bumble against Belgium, I am extremely nostalgic for stalwarts of the past. Whatever Donovan has left, can you imagine how he could open up the field with his speed and experience? As of now, the last chapter in my soccer book is sitting there, awaiting a conclusion. Your thoughts?
John McDermott
5/31/2013 06:34:08 am
I think Klinsmann has perhaps a bit too much pride(or is it ego?). He should have been dialing Landon and Bocanegra from the locker room after the Belgium game, and praying the Cherundolo and Holden return to full fitness ASAP. What an embarrassing mess that game was. Gonzalez almost makes me nostalgic for Alexi Lalas who I've always considered to be sort of a donkey. Glad to see the revival of Beasley, but he's not the answer at left back. One of the least successful USA teams in memory, Steve Sampson's 1998 group, nevertheless had players with class, skill and cleverness, guys like Ramos, Wynalda, Balboa, Dooley, McBride and Preki. How many players of that caliber in Klinsi's team? The USA has gotten very good at producing robotic college-trained players, but we seem to have gone backwards when it comes to developing real talent. And MLS is simply not a place where guys with real talent can fulfill their potential. And I'm already thinking ahead to who should replace Jürgen. Let's see: Dominic Kinnear? Tab Ramos? Peter Vermes? Hey, how about Bruce Arena? Or Siggi Schmid? 5/31/2013 09:44:23 am
George 5/31/2013 05:48:36 pm
Alan is spot on. U.S. Soccer is displaying absolutely no definitive style that identifies it as such. Generally speaking, we are not overly skillful ballhandlers. We are not artful passers. What we do well is attack vertically and defend horizontally, which was long the style in English professional soccer before teams there began stocking up on talent from South America, Africa and the Continent.. Of course, we need to work on adding some tangents and cosines to our field geometry, but that can develop with time and an overall consistent game strategy. Right now, Team USA exhibits the hesitancy one sees in junior league play. We need a program that fits American players' abilities and tendencies, that rewards the best examples of our superiority in speed and strength. We need Americans to develop and champion that program.
George Vecsey
6/1/2013 01:11:04 am
I generally think U.S. players need an American coach -- Arena and Bradley were quite fine. Klinsmann fit a lot of criterias; I'll reserve judgment on him. But Charlie used the right word -- hesitancy. The U.S. does not develop independent ( even selfish) players who can score because our players are never alone to work things out -- they are always waiting for Coach to yell at them to stay back. Hence, the struggle to get out of Concacaf region. GV
Brian Savin
6/3/2013 08:02:21 am
Re Last Chapter: I submit that the challenge is to find something more interesting than this conclusion: The powers that be in soccer are most likely the powers that will be for the foreseeable future. 6/3/2013 08:22:43 am
Don't we have to differentiate between the professional establishment and the national programs, Brian? I think that part of US soccer's problem is that we are accustomed to sports that begin and end as revenue generators. I recall seeing a letter of agreement between the North American Soccer League and ABC where the network would broadcast the League's 1973 All-Star game for $5000.00. Yep, Five Thousand. This was back when Kyle Rote Jr was the League's headliner, but it shows the relative value that TV execs soccer to have then and that value has increased only by degrees. If a robust professional program is necessary for the national program to succeed, we're definitely screwed
George Vecsey
6/3/2013 10:36:54 am
You guys are way ahead of me for the big picture.
Brian Savin
6/3/2013 02:47:00 pm
Actually, I'm not so sure about what's left as a distinction, Charlie. Let's explore it and you tell me if this makes sense or not: Isn't it the same teams in both contexts (national and professional) on top year after year? It seems to me that the professional league teams pick and choose among the national teams' best. Yes, Manchester City sneaked in after some new blood threw a pile of money into it, but weren't they bidding for the same small pool of top players? So, to get to your point, I think: isn't it the same national teams that control the game at both levels? And isn't the reason because those few top tier national organizations devote the most money to the game, and thereby can develop the organization to produce those players? What are the differences between the national and professional league teams?. Amateur status went out the window long ago. Everyone playing at the top level is money-oriented today it seems to me. I admit to being a terrible cynic, but following the money is ruining competitive sport, and I'm not seeing soccer as immune. Why not run the national programs on an organized, professional international basis and with the goal of encouraging competitive play? 6/3/2013 03:22:34 pm
I don't know if I'm being naïve. Both professional and amateur clubs and leagues answer to FIFA worldwide. What you're suggesting, in a roundabout way, is a soccer equivalent to the USGA, which stands in loyal opposition to the Royal & Ancient. If that's what you're suggesting, I agree. We're too separated in too many aspects from the FIFA royalty. We need our own organization, apart and unanswerable to FIFA, but perfectly willing to cooperate when everyone's interest is being served, such as the World Cup. That way, US soccerr can develop its identity from the top down, without the snobbery that we've become accustomed to from the Europeans and South Americans. MLS and the NCAA, along with all scholastic and youth programs would answer to an American authority. This might even be a way to consolidate sports relationships in Asia and Africa. There's no love lost for FIFA in either continent. You are a genius, Brian. Down with FIFA, up with whatever you want to call it. It's our declaration of soccer independence.
Brian Savin
6/4/2013 12:19:27 am
Actually, Charlie, you are the genius, because all I'm doing is flinging complaints while you are constructing a serious solution. So, then, the way you would go about this is to have the U.S. establish it's own framework and offer cooperation with Asia and Africa, who have similar self interests. Then, this group meets FIFA on a World Cup basis under rules that are negotiated on the basis of sound sport and not establishment power politics. FIFA would have little choice eventually, I suppose, because of the potential money and huge percentage of the world population the new group represents. Yup, that's on the road to real answers that just might work, Charlie! 6/3/2013 03:52:53 pm
George
Brian SAvin
6/4/2013 12:38:48 am
Alan, what do you think of Charlie's ides (or, more accurately, where I at least think he is heading)? Charlie seems to be saying that looking at the US place in the FIFA world may be just the wrong starting point. Maybe going our own way is better because we represent something different. Our participants are currently in the game for a great reason -- the love of pure sport. Charlie also notes that Asia and African countries share that passion. What's missing in these places is much of the big time money of FIFA, their NBA-style refs, their power politics and their prima donnas. Why is that so bad? Let's go our own way and then let's have a real World Cup and see if we can get U.S. vs. Soviet Union in Olympic hockey competition again down the road.
George Vecsey
6/4/2013 03:46:30 am
I think it's a good thing to burn to compete with the best nations. If they are going to run into a Germany or a Spain in the WC, might as well be able to compete. The last generation of male player has been admirable because they arrived where they did. But there could be a higher level of athleticism and genius. How to produce that? Poaching second-level Germans, and the odd Adu fiasco, doesn't seem to work. It's about competition. I love Beasley because he chose soccer over basketball in Fort Wayne. Until that happens nationally, with all groups, we'lll be scrambling in Concacaf. The gap may not be the fault of Klinsmann or federation. It's evolution. GV
Brian Savin
6/4/2013 06:44:28 am
Just a radical thought....
George Vecsey
6/4/2013 06:51:21 am
I think that's what the new ownership of the Cosmos logo has in mind, out on Long Island, aiming for a secondary league. I don't think Giorgia Chnaglia is coming back. But maybe the name could carry a league that Brian describes. GV
George Vecsey
6/4/2013 06:52:43 am
mi dispiace.
Brian Savin
6/5/2013 01:58:50 am
Not meaning to distract this thread from soccer, but the sudden news that MLB may slug the sluggers on drug charges is certainly interesting and I want to express intense interest in getting your read, George, as things progress. Lots spinning around and around. Does this mean MLB is still concerned about current abuses? Does this signal they are acquiescing to eliminate the Steroid Era from their record history and future Hall of Fame considerations? Does this mean the Yankees will try to sever their ties to their increasingly controversial star? What will be the message/impact on kids? Do heros matter? What would the Chipmunks think (assuming you all stopped arguing and wisecracking)? More basic, is what is happening important? Etc.
George Vecsey
6/5/2013 05:13:11 am
Brian, thanks for asking. I'm caught up in polishing my soccer book, great memories of France in 1998.)
John McDermott
6/5/2013 07:33:03 am
I would love to see a large-scale popular revolt against two sports organizations which badly need to be modernized and brought down a few pegs: The NCAA and FIFA.
George Vecsey
6/5/2013 12:29:29 pm
Joe Nocera has done a great job with the NCAA for the NYT in the past year. 6/7/2013 04:25:17 am
There is merit to the many comments and suggestions concerning the USMNT and soccer in the US. Although they both address US soccer, improving the USMNT and separating from FIFA are two separate issues. 6/7/2013 03:10:09 pm
Alan - If this little brain-storming session results in a broader conversation about the US role in international soccer and our ability to effect some self-determinism, then I'm be proud to be a part of the timeline. I really don't have anything to offer other than opinions, but I'd be happy to contribute my time and some cash to the cause, if it comes to that. 6/7/2013 03:13:34 pm
And George - You may have to start your next book where this one ends - following Alan into the thin air of Olympus and recording the results.
George Vecsey
6/8/2013 01:30:33 am
Thanks. I'm just sweating out whether my last chapter should be geared toward the qualification for 2014 or falling short. But I used to do that with "early" columns before big events -- without predicting a result.
Ed Martin
6/9/2013 08:30:37 am
It may not be relevant in the World Cup story, but I know you covered the U.S. Women's win in the Greece Olympics, (and elsewhere) and I think Women's Soccer/Futball is a great story of recent years. Ciao.
George Vecsey
6/9/2013 12:50:43 pm
Ed, thanks., Two chapters in the book will be about the women, one the 1996 Olympics, the other the 1999 WWC, which leads to the next 14 years....You're right on it. There has never been an American national team, men or women, like that soccer generation. I do a whole riff on that. Best, GV 6/10/2013 05:40:10 am
George
George Vecsey
6/10/2013 06:00:16 am
Alan, great to hear from you. I recently re-read Jere Longman's great book, The Girls of Summer, and was touched by how much the concept of team meant to those great players. Mia Hamm wanted to fit in. Tony DiCicco, the coach, talks about how he had to revise what he would say to female athletes as opposed to male. Yet their cdamaraderie did not keep them from being the most competitive and resourceful US team we've ever seen.
Hansen Alexander
6/27/2013 06:33:47 am
At last, your soccer book! I'm looking forward to reading it. 4/29/2014 11:01:52 pm
Its a great pleasure reading your post.Its full of information I am looking for and I love to post a comment that "The content of your post is awesome" Great work Comments are closed.
|
Categories
All
|