One thing I noticed at the conference at Hofstra University the past three days: the coming World Cup in Brazil is going to provide the biggest spotlight ever pointed at the soccer establishment.
Between the rampant scandals at FIFA and the protests in Brazil, the world is going to be watching in a different way than at all previous World Cups. Now the journalists and academics and fans are asking, is this the right way to run a sport? Does soccer need to impose such harsh demands about expensive stadiums and infrastructure on people who have been told they really need this party? There were already demonstrations in Brazil in 2013, and the favelas, the neighborhoods have been further disrupted for a six-week frolic for outsiders. That conflict seemed to be the common theme among the mix of former professional players, journalists, academics and fans who mixed in esoteric panels. This really is the world’s sport. Yet it has gone ever further into the control of the corporations and networks and the murky home office of FIFA, the world soccer body. Maybe the most telling sign was raised by David Goldblatt from the University of Bristol, U.K., who noted that the organizers in Brazil are banning musical instruments in the stands. (He’s a fan of the South African vuvuzela that terrorized eardrums in 2010.) Imagine a soccer game in the land of Jobim and de Moraes, Veloso and Gilberto, Gil and Costa, Ana & Jorge and Morelenbaum2Sakomoto, without a few drums and horns and guitars? But FIFA is tone deaf as well as opaque. The restive state of Brazil was noted by Peter Alegi of Michigan State University, who recalled how home fans spontaneously sang the second stanza of the national anthem during the Confederations Cup – a sign of further independence, perhaps. Every panel reminded me of the deep hold this sport has everywhere, including my alma mater of Hofstra, where the new version of the Cosmos is currently playing. Hofstra bestowed an honorary doctorate on Pelé, the greatest of the Cosmos. He lit up the place. He is Pelé. The links between soccer success and national image were stressed by Alexander Kitroeff of Haverford College, who noted how his homeland of Greece was stirred by the surprising victory at the 2004 European championship. Greeks were also aware that the squad had been given shape by a German coach, Otto Rehhagel. One of the nicest parts of the conference was the papers delivered by young people coming along as the United States matures as a soccer nation. Christopher Davis of Florida International University gave a paper on “The New Germans: How the 2010 World Cup Showed the Evolution of Germany’s Immigration Policy” – the Turkish, African and Polish influence on the German squad. And Lisa Quach, about to graduate from Hofstra and looking for a job in publishing, delivered a knowing paper on “Black, Blanc, Bleu: National Identity in French Football,” recalling how players from the vast diaspora of France played together in the glorious home championship of 1998. One of the great spontaneous dialogues between true believers took place during the Q&A section of a panel. In the audience, Arnie Ramirez, the great former coach of Long Island University, said he preferred the short-pass offense; he wiggled his hand like a trout. Greg Lalas, former M.L.S. player and editor of MLSsoccer.com, responded, what about the laser long ball that lands on a striker’s chest near the goal? They debated for a few minutes. It was wonderful. A defiant note was sounded at the final plenary session by Charlie Stillitano, Princeton star, World Cup 1994 official and first general manager of the MetroStars. Charlie said he doesn’t want to hear any more bleats that America is not a soccer country. There are now five major sports in the United States, Charlie said. Get over it. I thank Stanislao Pugliese and Brenda Elsey of Hofstra who ran this conference, and all the other nice people who make Hofstra work. And I thank all the true believers who reminded us that, good and bad, the World Cup is almost here.
John McDermott
4/13/2014 09:04:17 pm
The FIFA World Cup and the NFL Super Bowl have one thing in common: they have both become primarily huge hospitality events for sponsoring corporations and broadcasters. They are no longer within reach of the common fan, other than as a television spectacle. Much is made of the forthcoming World Cup taking place in the home of the beautiful game(no apology necessary here to England, we know the game was born there but it matured into its highest form elsewhere...). I think that to the extent the event has any Brazilian feel it will be much more outside of the stadiums than inside of them. FIFA wants a sanitize corporate event and it will make sure its "partners" get what they paid for.
George Vecsey
4/14/2014 01:05:54 am
John, absolutely.The funny thing is that FIFA has emulated the worst parts of the Super Bowl without knowing how to publicize its biggest asset -- the players. The Super Bowl stresses the players -- makes them available. The World Cup uses the mixed zone to encourage players to bolt. It's basically disdain. The emerging spontaneous theme of the Hofstra conference was that the people of Brazil have serious issues, which may lead to the most direct questioning of FIFA yet. GV
Ed Martin
4/15/2014 10:00:02 am
i enjoyed reading about the Pele/Vecsey conference at Hofstra, ( my words, not yours ). Despite the problems in leadership the game IS the World Game. I am reminded of Wiiliam Faulkner's Comments at the Nobel ceremony about the human spirit, "We will not only endure--we will prevail."
George Vecsey
4/15/2014 01:07:07 pm
Ed, nice to hear from you. I think football already prevails around the world, and is growing here. I agree with Stillitano. Prevail? Well, we have some other great team sports in the US.
Ed Martin
4/15/2014 03:43:42 pm
George, I did not write clearly my meaning, it is that Soccer/football, despite the imperfections in FIFA and elsewhere will prevail over its own problems because it is a great game and the "World's Game." I would love to see it become a great American favorite, but prevailing against other sports, is not my goal. I have a friend, 81, who is an active curler and he lives in Arizona. There is a message about prevailing there.
George Vecsey
4/16/2014 12:44:51 am
Ed, got it. I think FIFA has been found out, to some degree, but what sponsors and networks and potentially powerful federations can or will do about it is another question. Your good point is what I took away from the Hofstra conference -- people feel proprietary about the sport, love it for its surprises and history and rivalries. And that does prevail. Thanks, GV 4/20/2014 07:04:40 am
George’s accurate and informative summary of Hofstra’s great four day soccer event gave a good sense of the excitement.
George Vecsey
4/21/2014 09:15:05 am
Alan, thanks for your perspective. Great to see you at Hofstra. Comments are closed.
|
Categories
All
|